from Itchmo.com:
UP TO 8,500 PET DEATHS, FOOD TAINTED SINCE 2006
The FDA press conference yielded new information.
Here are the highlights:
-Of 17,000 calls up to 50% claimed their pets died.
-Pet food from 2006 tested positive for melamine.
No samples available prior to that date.
-2.7 million chickens ate tainted food. In addition, tainted
pet food consumed by chickens in hundreds of farms.
-Will not give clear answer to whether people ate those
chickens.
-No details given on investigation in China. Not even the
number of investigators.
-Can’t rule out contamination in other vegetable protein.
-All tainted ingredients went to pet food companies.
Showing posts with label industry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label industry. Show all posts
Thursday, May 03, 2007
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
FDA IMPORT ALERT
Finally, nearly two months later, the FDA is a little closer to announcing what many of us suspected all along. Problem is, the import alert (NOT a press release, NOT an update) they posted on 4/27/06 is so buried on their website that bloggers only found it late last night!
That import alert which must be read to be believed - notes an extremely large increase in the number of pets the FDA is willing to suggest have been killed by tainted products. On 4/26/07 FDA officials repeated that that only "16" pets are reported dead - the same day at which they said they weren’t expecting more recalls,
(even though a recall was made just before or during the media conference, and four more in the hours after) the alert dropped quietly onto the FDA’s Web site 4/27/06. It happens to note:
The info on their alert is a start. It's still a mess though and they really don't know what's going on. Add in the fact that melamine has been spiking our food and Fido's food for decades and it's no wonder there more questions than answers.
IA #99-29, 4/27/07, IMPORT ALERT #99-29, "DETENTION WITHOUT PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION OF ALL VEGETABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS FROM CHINA FOR ANIMAL OR HUMAN
FOOD USE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF MELAMINE AND/OR MELAMINE ANALOGS"
TYPE OF ALERT: Detention Without Physical Examination (Countrywide)
(Note: This import alert represents the Agency's current guidance to FDA field
personnel regarding the manufacturer(s) and/or products(s) at issue. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on any person, and does not operate to
bind FDA or the public).
PRODUCTS: Wheat Gluten
Rice Gluten
Rice Protein
Rice Protein Concentrate
Corn Gluten
Corn Gluten Meal
Corn By-Products
Soy Protein
Soy Gluten
Proteins (includes amino acids and protein hydrosylates)
Mung Bean Protein
PRODUCT 02G[][]08 - Soy Bean Meal/Powder/Gluten/Protein Isolate
CODES: 18E[][]03 Soy Protein Powder
02F[][]08 Wheat Gluten
02E[][]06 - Wheat Flour Gluten
71M[][]01 Wheat Gluten
02D[][]12 Rice Protein
02D[][]13 Rice Gluten
71I[][]03 Rice Protein
71G[][]02 - Corn Gluten
02B[][][][] Milled Rice Products
54[][][][][]- Amino acids and protein hydrosylates
PROBLEM: Poisonous or Deleterious Substance
Unfit For Food
Unsafe Food Additive
PAF: PES
COUNTRY: China (CN)
MANUFACTURER/SHIPPER: All
CHARGES: "The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to
section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a
poisonous or deleterious substance, which may render it
injurious to health [Adulteration, section 402(a)(1)]"
and/or
"The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to
section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a
food additive that is unsafe within the meaning of section
409 [Adulteration, section 402(a)(2)(C)(i)]"
and/or
"The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant
to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be unfit for
food [Adulteration, 402(a)(3)]"
RECOMMENDING
OFFICE: Division of Import Operations and Policy, HFC-170
REASON FOR
ALERT: In recent weeks, there has been an outbreak of cat and dog deaths
and illness associated with pet food manufactured with vegetable
proteins contaminated with melamine and melamine related
compounds. In response to this outbreak, FDA has been conducting
an aggressive and intensive investigation. Pet food manufacturers
and others have recalled dog and cat food and other suspect
products and ingredients. This has been one of the largest pet
food recalls in history, a recall that continues to expand. Thus
far, 18 firms have recalled product, 17 Class I and 1 class II,
covering over 5,300 product lines. As of April 26, 2007, FDA had
received over 17,000 consumer complaints relating to this
outbreak, and those complaints included reports of approximately
1,950 deaths of cats and 2,200 deaths of dogs. The Agency is
working with federal, state, and local governments, academia, and
industry to assess the extent of the outbreak, better understand
how melamine and melamine related compounds contributed to the pet
deaths and illnesses, and to determine the underlying cause of the
contamination.
As of April 26, 2007, FDA had collected approximately 750 samples
of wheat gluten and products made with wheat gluten and, of those
tested thus far, 330 were positive for melamine and/or melamine
related compounds. FDA had also collected approximately 85
samples of rice protein concentrate and products made with rice
protein concentrate and, of those tested thus far, 27 were
positive for melamine and/or melamine related compounds. FDA's
investigation has traced all of the positive samples as having
been imported from China.
Although FDA's investigation is ongoing, the Agency has learned
the following about the outbreak and its association with
contaminated vegetable proteins from China:
1. For the vegetable proteins and finished products that have been
found to be contaminated, it is unknown who the actual
manufacturers are, how many manufacturers there are, or where in
China they may be located.
The samples of vegetable proteins that have tested positive for
the presence of melamine and melamine analogs have, thus far, been
traced to two Chinese firms, Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology
Development Co. Ltd. and Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co.
Ltd. Records relating to the importation of these products
indicate that these two firms had manufactured the ingredients in
question. There is strong evidence, however, that these firms are
not the actual manufacturers. Moreover, despite many weeks of
investigation, it is still unknown who the actual manufacturer or
manufacturers of the contaminated products imported from China
are.
All of the contaminated wheat gluten has thus far been traced to
Xuzhou Anying. According to the General Administration of Quality
Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) of the Chinese
government, Xuzhou Anying purchased its wheat gluten from 25
different manufacturers and Xuzhou Anying may just be a supplier.
Press statements by Xuzhou Anying state that it did not
manufacturer the wheat gluten it had shipped to United States that
has been associated with the outbreak, but that it received that
wheat gluten from other sources not named in the press statements.
Despite its investigation into the matter, FDA has been unable to
determine who, in fact, the actual manufacturer(s) are.
2. The source of the contamination problem is currently unknown and
FDA has been unable to isolate the scope of the problem.
Melamine is a molecule that has a number of commercial and
industrial uses. Other than a few limited authorizations for use
in food contact materials for human food, melamine has no approved
use as an ingredient in human or animal food in the United States.
FDA is continuing its investigation into how the melamine and
melamine related compounds may have gotten into the vegetable
protein, and has asked the Chinese government to help with this
investigation.
In addition, FDA does not know how widespread the problem in China
might be. For example, FDA does not know which regions of the
country may or may not be impacted by the problem, which firms are
the major manufacturers and exporters of vegetable proteins to the
United States, where these vegetable proteins are grown in China,
and what controls are currently in place to prevent against
contamination.
According to the Chinese government, Xuzhou Anying did not declare
the contaminated wheat gluten it shipped to the United States as a
raw material for feed or food. Rather, according to the Chinese
government, it was declared to them as non-food product, meaning
that it was not subject to mandatory inspection by the Chinese
government. In addition, in a communication to the U.S.
government, the Chinese government has requested that FDA either
request or require that U.S. importers of plant protein products
insist on AQSIQ certification, based on AQSIQ testing, as part of
the import contract. According to a media report, China's Foreign
Ministry issued a statement that the contaminated vegetable
protein managed to get past Chinese customs without inspection
because it had not been declared for use in pet food. The news
report said the contamination problem has prompted China to step
up inspections of plant-based proteins and to list melamine as a
banned substance for food exports and domestic sales.
This information indicates that there are manufacturing control
issues that cannot be linked to specific sources in China, but
instead require country-wide monitoring.
3. On April 17, 2007, pet food manufacturers in South Africa recalled
dry cat and dog food due to formulation with a contaminated corn
gluten, a vegetable protein. FDA has learned that the corn gluten
was contaminated with melamine and that the corn gluten had been
imported from a third-party supplier in China. According to news
reports, the contaminated pet food has been linked to the deaths
of approximately 30 dogs in South Africa.
GUIDANCE: Districts may detain without physical examination, all Vegetable
protein products from China.
Appropriate screening criteria have been set.
For questions or issues concerning science, science policy, sample
collection, analysis, preparation, or analytical methodology,
contact Mr. Thomas Savage, Division of Field Science, at 301-827-
1026.
If a firm, shipper or importer believes that their product should
not be subject to detention under this import alert they should
forward information supporting their position to FDA at the
following address:
Food and Drug Administration
Division of Import Operations and Policy (HFC-170)
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12-36
Rockville, MD 20587
In order to adequately assess whether a manufacturer has the
appropriate controls and processes in place to ensure the quality
of the product being produced, the firm or shipper must provide
the following information:
1. Documentation showing that a minimum of five (5)
consecutive entries have been released by FDA based on
third party laboratory analyses using FDA recommended
methods and that all shipments did not contain the
presence of melamine and/or melamine analogs.
AND
2. Certificate, such as from AQSIQ, indicating that an
inspection of the manufacturer was conducted and
adequate controls are in place. Information should
also include:
a. Copy of the inspectional reports and compliance
status of the manufacturer.
b. If products were sampled during the course of the
inspection, test results indicating that the
products are free of melamine and/or melamine
analog.
All requests for removal (exemption) from DWPE will be forwarded
by DIOP to CVM (HFV-230) or CFSAN (HFS-606) for
evaluation depending on the intended final use in animal
or human food.
PRIORITIZATION
GUIDANCE: I
FOI: No purging required
KEYWORDS: Feed, pet food, human food, melamine, gluten, protein,
concentrate, rice, wheat, corn, soy, mung bean
PREPARED BY: Cathie Marshall, CVM, HFV-232, 240-276-9217
Salvatore Evola, CFSAN, HFS-606- 302-436-2164
Linda Wisniowski, DIOP, HFC-172, 301-443-6553
DATE LOADED
INTO FIARS: April 27, 2007
That import alert which must be read to be believed - notes an extremely large increase in the number of pets the FDA is willing to suggest have been killed by tainted products. On 4/26/07 FDA officials repeated that that only "16" pets are reported dead - the same day at which they said they weren’t expecting more recalls,
(even though a recall was made just before or during the media conference, and four more in the hours after) the alert dropped quietly onto the FDA’s Web site 4/27/06. It happens to note:
This has been one of the largest pet food recalls in history, a recall that continues to expand. Thus far, 18 firms have recalled product, 17 Class I and 1 class II, covering over 5,300 product lines. As of April 26, 2007, FDA had received over 17,000 consumer complaints relating to this outbreak, and those complaints included reports of approximately 1950 deaths of cats and 2200 deaths of dogs.
The info on their alert is a start. It's still a mess though and they really don't know what's going on. Add in the fact that melamine has been spiking our food and Fido's food for decades and it's no wonder there more questions than answers.
IA #99-29, 4/27/07, IMPORT ALERT #99-29, "DETENTION WITHOUT PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION OF ALL VEGETABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS FROM CHINA FOR ANIMAL OR HUMAN
FOOD USE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF MELAMINE AND/OR MELAMINE ANALOGS"
TYPE OF ALERT: Detention Without Physical Examination (Countrywide)
(Note: This import alert represents the Agency's current guidance to FDA field
personnel regarding the manufacturer(s) and/or products(s) at issue. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on any person, and does not operate to
bind FDA or the public).
PRODUCTS: Wheat Gluten
Rice Gluten
Rice Protein
Rice Protein Concentrate
Corn Gluten
Corn Gluten Meal
Corn By-Products
Soy Protein
Soy Gluten
Proteins (includes amino acids and protein hydrosylates)
Mung Bean Protein
PRODUCT 02G[][]08 - Soy Bean Meal/Powder/Gluten/Protein Isolate
CODES: 18E[][]03 Soy Protein Powder
02F[][]08 Wheat Gluten
02E[][]06 - Wheat Flour Gluten
71M[][]01 Wheat Gluten
02D[][]12 Rice Protein
02D[][]13 Rice Gluten
71I[][]03 Rice Protein
71G[][]02 - Corn Gluten
02B[][][][] Milled Rice Products
54[][][][][]- Amino acids and protein hydrosylates
PROBLEM: Poisonous or Deleterious Substance
Unfit For Food
Unsafe Food Additive
PAF: PES
COUNTRY: China (CN)
MANUFACTURER/SHIPPER: All
CHARGES: "The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to
section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a
poisonous or deleterious substance, which may render it
injurious to health [Adulteration, section 402(a)(1)]"
and/or
"The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to
section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to bear or contain a
food additive that is unsafe within the meaning of section
409 [Adulteration, section 402(a)(2)(C)(i)]"
and/or
"The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant
to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be unfit for
food [Adulteration, 402(a)(3)]"
RECOMMENDING
OFFICE: Division of Import Operations and Policy, HFC-170
REASON FOR
ALERT: In recent weeks, there has been an outbreak of cat and dog deaths
and illness associated with pet food manufactured with vegetable
proteins contaminated with melamine and melamine related
compounds. In response to this outbreak, FDA has been conducting
an aggressive and intensive investigation. Pet food manufacturers
and others have recalled dog and cat food and other suspect
products and ingredients. This has been one of the largest pet
food recalls in history, a recall that continues to expand. Thus
far, 18 firms have recalled product, 17 Class I and 1 class II,
covering over 5,300 product lines. As of April 26, 2007, FDA had
received over 17,000 consumer complaints relating to this
outbreak, and those complaints included reports of approximately
1,950 deaths of cats and 2,200 deaths of dogs. The Agency is
working with federal, state, and local governments, academia, and
industry to assess the extent of the outbreak, better understand
how melamine and melamine related compounds contributed to the pet
deaths and illnesses, and to determine the underlying cause of the
contamination.
As of April 26, 2007, FDA had collected approximately 750 samples
of wheat gluten and products made with wheat gluten and, of those
tested thus far, 330 were positive for melamine and/or melamine
related compounds. FDA had also collected approximately 85
samples of rice protein concentrate and products made with rice
protein concentrate and, of those tested thus far, 27 were
positive for melamine and/or melamine related compounds. FDA's
investigation has traced all of the positive samples as having
been imported from China.
Although FDA's investigation is ongoing, the Agency has learned
the following about the outbreak and its association with
contaminated vegetable proteins from China:
1. For the vegetable proteins and finished products that have been
found to be contaminated, it is unknown who the actual
manufacturers are, how many manufacturers there are, or where in
China they may be located.
The samples of vegetable proteins that have tested positive for
the presence of melamine and melamine analogs have, thus far, been
traced to two Chinese firms, Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology
Development Co. Ltd. and Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co.
Ltd. Records relating to the importation of these products
indicate that these two firms had manufactured the ingredients in
question. There is strong evidence, however, that these firms are
not the actual manufacturers. Moreover, despite many weeks of
investigation, it is still unknown who the actual manufacturer or
manufacturers of the contaminated products imported from China
are.
All of the contaminated wheat gluten has thus far been traced to
Xuzhou Anying. According to the General Administration of Quality
Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) of the Chinese
government, Xuzhou Anying purchased its wheat gluten from 25
different manufacturers and Xuzhou Anying may just be a supplier.
Press statements by Xuzhou Anying state that it did not
manufacturer the wheat gluten it had shipped to United States that
has been associated with the outbreak, but that it received that
wheat gluten from other sources not named in the press statements.
Despite its investigation into the matter, FDA has been unable to
determine who, in fact, the actual manufacturer(s) are.
2. The source of the contamination problem is currently unknown and
FDA has been unable to isolate the scope of the problem.
Melamine is a molecule that has a number of commercial and
industrial uses. Other than a few limited authorizations for use
in food contact materials for human food, melamine has no approved
use as an ingredient in human or animal food in the United States.
FDA is continuing its investigation into how the melamine and
melamine related compounds may have gotten into the vegetable
protein, and has asked the Chinese government to help with this
investigation.
In addition, FDA does not know how widespread the problem in China
might be. For example, FDA does not know which regions of the
country may or may not be impacted by the problem, which firms are
the major manufacturers and exporters of vegetable proteins to the
United States, where these vegetable proteins are grown in China,
and what controls are currently in place to prevent against
contamination.
According to the Chinese government, Xuzhou Anying did not declare
the contaminated wheat gluten it shipped to the United States as a
raw material for feed or food. Rather, according to the Chinese
government, it was declared to them as non-food product, meaning
that it was not subject to mandatory inspection by the Chinese
government. In addition, in a communication to the U.S.
government, the Chinese government has requested that FDA either
request or require that U.S. importers of plant protein products
insist on AQSIQ certification, based on AQSIQ testing, as part of
the import contract. According to a media report, China's Foreign
Ministry issued a statement that the contaminated vegetable
protein managed to get past Chinese customs without inspection
because it had not been declared for use in pet food. The news
report said the contamination problem has prompted China to step
up inspections of plant-based proteins and to list melamine as a
banned substance for food exports and domestic sales.
This information indicates that there are manufacturing control
issues that cannot be linked to specific sources in China, but
instead require country-wide monitoring.
3. On April 17, 2007, pet food manufacturers in South Africa recalled
dry cat and dog food due to formulation with a contaminated corn
gluten, a vegetable protein. FDA has learned that the corn gluten
was contaminated with melamine and that the corn gluten had been
imported from a third-party supplier in China. According to news
reports, the contaminated pet food has been linked to the deaths
of approximately 30 dogs in South Africa.
GUIDANCE: Districts may detain without physical examination, all Vegetable
protein products from China.
Appropriate screening criteria have been set.
For questions or issues concerning science, science policy, sample
collection, analysis, preparation, or analytical methodology,
contact Mr. Thomas Savage, Division of Field Science, at 301-827-
1026.
If a firm, shipper or importer believes that their product should
not be subject to detention under this import alert they should
forward information supporting their position to FDA at the
following address:
Food and Drug Administration
Division of Import Operations and Policy (HFC-170)
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12-36
Rockville, MD 20587
In order to adequately assess whether a manufacturer has the
appropriate controls and processes in place to ensure the quality
of the product being produced, the firm or shipper must provide
the following information:
1. Documentation showing that a minimum of five (5)
consecutive entries have been released by FDA based on
third party laboratory analyses using FDA recommended
methods and that all shipments did not contain the
presence of melamine and/or melamine analogs.
AND
2. Certificate, such as from AQSIQ, indicating that an
inspection of the manufacturer was conducted and
adequate controls are in place. Information should
also include:
a. Copy of the inspectional reports and compliance
status of the manufacturer.
b. If products were sampled during the course of the
inspection, test results indicating that the
products are free of melamine and/or melamine
analog.
All requests for removal (exemption) from DWPE will be forwarded
by DIOP to CVM (HFV-230) or CFSAN (HFS-606) for
evaluation depending on the intended final use in animal
or human food.
PRIORITIZATION
GUIDANCE: I
FOI: No purging required
KEYWORDS: Feed, pet food, human food, melamine, gluten, protein,
concentrate, rice, wheat, corn, soy, mung bean
PREPARED BY: Cathie Marshall, CVM, HFV-232, 240-276-9217
Salvatore Evola, CFSAN, HFS-606- 302-436-2164
Linda Wisniowski, DIOP, HFC-172, 301-443-6553
DATE LOADED
INTO FIARS: April 27, 2007
Thursday, April 26, 2007
More Recalls
I was supposed to log on an discuss the democratic debate
but was hit with not one, not two, but three recalls in my inbox.
I'm just drained.
I was angry before this recall ever became personal. In fact,
I might have been a little smug about the fact that I was ahead
of the game and didn't feed "those" kinds of foods. But on
4/16/07 the recall concerning Natural Balance become personal.
Luckily none of the cats and dogs show sign of damage (Bix
even had bloodwork recently and came out with just an
elevated glucose reading which might have been due to stress
at vet (i'm trying to figure out a way to collect his urine to get
tested and rule out diabetes).
My co-workers dog, Ginger, wasn't so lucky. After I
recommended Natural Balance to her (and my brother and
many other people). This was right after the Nutro/Menu recall
in March and she bought a bag of the Venison & Brown Rice
and fed it to her yorkie. After the 2nd or 3rd day her dog had
bloody stools, was lethargic and vomitting. She though it might
be a delayed reaction to the bad Nutro. After 2 days on fluids
at the vets she was diagnosed with chronic kidney failure.
An otherwise healthy, middle-aged dog with no health issues
(just had a full blood count done a few months ago and was
fine) turns up violently ill overnight. Hmmm..
My co-worker took her now stable dog home and continued
to feed her the Natural Balance because at that point it wasn't
on any recall lists - in fact, it's sales were booming as a direct
result of the Menu recall and the demand for premium pet food.
Ginger's kidneys spiked again and then stabilized again only
after she was fed a prescription kidney formula. It had to be
the Natural Balance all along! Today they recalled more food
- this time flavors and formulas that I have been feeding the
cats and dogs. They say it is only precautionary and they
haven't received complaints. They are not to be believed.
They are liars. They are playing the victim ("the rice protein
concentrate was put in without our knowledge")!!! What
happened to the statement they made (in large, red letters)
on their website, that they use "their own employees to
oversee and manufacture their food and that it is tested
BEFORE, DURING and AFTER production" !!! What happened
to listing the suspect ingredient on their website only on the
day of the recall? I can't believe I was fooled by their
marketing back in January and fell for the pitch. That's
what is so scary about all this.. that any of the "safe"
companies can turn out not to be so tomorrow.
Anyway..
When my co-worker got through to Natural Balance (after
3 days of the busy signal and only then after I gave her
the contact info of a NB rep that had emailed me). He
told her that the bag she was feeding was not part of
the recall!!! (even though they recalled ALL lots of the food).
She called the FDA to file an official complaint. The FDA
complaints now total over 12,000. I just viewed a list of
names that are part of a lawsuit against Menu Foods and
it was just pages upon pages and you know that those are
all people that lost their pets.
I think that if continue to follow these developments I
will go mad.
I am literally on a tightrope, which is on fire... and i'm
only one step ahead of the flame.
but was hit with not one, not two, but three recalls in my inbox.
I'm just drained.
I was angry before this recall ever became personal. In fact,
I might have been a little smug about the fact that I was ahead
of the game and didn't feed "those" kinds of foods. But on
4/16/07 the recall concerning Natural Balance become personal.
Luckily none of the cats and dogs show sign of damage (Bix
even had bloodwork recently and came out with just an
elevated glucose reading which might have been due to stress
at vet (i'm trying to figure out a way to collect his urine to get
tested and rule out diabetes).
My co-workers dog, Ginger, wasn't so lucky. After I
recommended Natural Balance to her (and my brother and
many other people). This was right after the Nutro/Menu recall
in March and she bought a bag of the Venison & Brown Rice
and fed it to her yorkie. After the 2nd or 3rd day her dog had
bloody stools, was lethargic and vomitting. She though it might
be a delayed reaction to the bad Nutro. After 2 days on fluids
at the vets she was diagnosed with chronic kidney failure.
An otherwise healthy, middle-aged dog with no health issues
(just had a full blood count done a few months ago and was
fine) turns up violently ill overnight. Hmmm..
My co-worker took her now stable dog home and continued
to feed her the Natural Balance because at that point it wasn't
on any recall lists - in fact, it's sales were booming as a direct
result of the Menu recall and the demand for premium pet food.
Ginger's kidneys spiked again and then stabilized again only
after she was fed a prescription kidney formula. It had to be
the Natural Balance all along! Today they recalled more food
- this time flavors and formulas that I have been feeding the
cats and dogs. They say it is only precautionary and they
haven't received complaints. They are not to be believed.
They are liars. They are playing the victim ("the rice protein
concentrate was put in without our knowledge")!!! What
happened to the statement they made (in large, red letters)
on their website, that they use "their own employees to
oversee and manufacture their food and that it is tested
BEFORE, DURING and AFTER production" !!! What happened
to listing the suspect ingredient on their website only on the
day of the recall? I can't believe I was fooled by their
marketing back in January and fell for the pitch. That's
what is so scary about all this.. that any of the "safe"
companies can turn out not to be so tomorrow.
Anyway..
When my co-worker got through to Natural Balance (after
3 days of the busy signal and only then after I gave her
the contact info of a NB rep that had emailed me). He
told her that the bag she was feeding was not part of
the recall!!! (even though they recalled ALL lots of the food).
She called the FDA to file an official complaint. The FDA
complaints now total over 12,000. I just viewed a list of
names that are part of a lawsuit against Menu Foods and
it was just pages upon pages and you know that those are
all people that lost their pets.
I think that if continue to follow these developments I
will go mad.
I am literally on a tightrope, which is on fire... and i'm
only one step ahead of the flame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)